What is timber? It is used that has been harvested from trees to be used in building houses, and other structure. If you are an environmentalist, you are probably against the idea of trees being harvested, being that it will limit the living habitats of an entire local wildlife. However, there are some countries and states, like timber harvesting PA, that does timber harvesting for the reason of expanding the population the entire local wildlife. So aside from the government and property owner profiting from it, it also benefits the wildlife in the area.
But if one really thinks about it, what would one do without the materials, which are necessities in building. Would it be a simple thing to do, to just stop harvesting timber, what about the needs to the human economy, the needs of every couple who are starting out to build a home. Can building a home be possible without a house.
Having some of the older trees cut down provides that chance for little trees and sapling to grow and flourish and therefore becoming the habitats of some local wildlife. And this has been proven in a study that has been conducted to ensure the existence of these animals.
Another benefit would be timber management provides tax benefits to local government. And with tax the government could devise better projects for the development of the state and people living in the community.
Everyone knows the fact that for every group of animals is a different preference in what kind of habitat they feel most safe and comfortable in, just like every human being who has preference. So now what happens if all the trees have the same length and width, do you think it will promote diversity of wildlife.
For the main reason, that they are continuously profiting from it, and they would not want their profit to stop, although it is not for a great humanitarian reason, but it is a great assurance that they will not allow the forest to die in the present or the near future.
There is simply so much profit, in preserving the forest and the trees, rather than disposing them all. And that is more than enough to prove that they would not be too hasty to cut down the life that provides homes to the hundreds or thousands of wild life depending on the forest.
First of animals have different habitat and preference where they think would fit them well. Like all human beings we do not stay in a place that does not meet our own preference and lifestyle. Imagine a forest that has the same trees that have the same age, length and width. This kind of environment might be beneficial to some animals, but not to all.
A house where they could build a family of their own, and everyone has to admit the fact that without these resources that the forest provides, then no one would be living so comfortable these days. There is nothing wrong with harvest materials as long as one remains grateful and preserve the forest for future generations to benefit from it.
But if one really thinks about it, what would one do without the materials, which are necessities in building. Would it be a simple thing to do, to just stop harvesting timber, what about the needs to the human economy, the needs of every couple who are starting out to build a home. Can building a home be possible without a house.
Having some of the older trees cut down provides that chance for little trees and sapling to grow and flourish and therefore becoming the habitats of some local wildlife. And this has been proven in a study that has been conducted to ensure the existence of these animals.
Another benefit would be timber management provides tax benefits to local government. And with tax the government could devise better projects for the development of the state and people living in the community.
Everyone knows the fact that for every group of animals is a different preference in what kind of habitat they feel most safe and comfortable in, just like every human being who has preference. So now what happens if all the trees have the same length and width, do you think it will promote diversity of wildlife.
For the main reason, that they are continuously profiting from it, and they would not want their profit to stop, although it is not for a great humanitarian reason, but it is a great assurance that they will not allow the forest to die in the present or the near future.
There is simply so much profit, in preserving the forest and the trees, rather than disposing them all. And that is more than enough to prove that they would not be too hasty to cut down the life that provides homes to the hundreds or thousands of wild life depending on the forest.
First of animals have different habitat and preference where they think would fit them well. Like all human beings we do not stay in a place that does not meet our own preference and lifestyle. Imagine a forest that has the same trees that have the same age, length and width. This kind of environment might be beneficial to some animals, but not to all.
A house where they could build a family of their own, and everyone has to admit the fact that without these resources that the forest provides, then no one would be living so comfortable these days. There is nothing wrong with harvest materials as long as one remains grateful and preserve the forest for future generations to benefit from it.
About the Author:
When you are searching for information about timber harvesting PA residents can come to our web pages online today. More details are available at http://www.amlogging.com/timber-harvesting now.
No comments:
Post a Comment